Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | harodt | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Golgari Midrange | xelz | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Golgari Midrange | aleister95 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Unknown Archetype | don_goto1990 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Golgari Midrange | slaxx | 5-0 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Legends , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Doubling , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Reanimator , Abzan Roots , Abzan Superfriends , Bant Beanstalk , Domain Zur Overlords
Meta Performance Analysis
Restless Cottage ranks #340 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Colorless average: 54.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Restless Cottage is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 31.86 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.0%. Restless Cottage has a win rate of 65.5%, making it 5.1% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blanchwood Prowler | Creature — Elemental | 9 | 77.2% | 3 |
| Locust Spray | Instant | 9 | 71.5% | 4 |
| Urborg Lhurgoyf | Creature — Lhurgoyf | 10 | 69.5% | 3 |
| Vinereap Mentor | Creature — Squirrel Druid | 8 | 67.9% | 3 |
| Cenote Scout | Creature — Merfolk Scout | 11 | 66.6% | 4 |
| Zur, Eternal Schemer | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 7 | 65.1% | 4 |
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 36 | 63.3% | 12 |
| Gnawing Vermin | Creature — Rat | 11 | 63.2% | 3 |
| Hollow Marauder | Creature — Specter Rogue | 11 | 63.2% | 3 |
| Huskburster Swarm | Creature — Elemental Insect | 11 | 63.2% | 3 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Restless Cottage than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The End | Instant | 4 | 7 | 77.1% | 67.6% | +9.6% |
| Scavenging Ooze | Creature — Ooze | 2 | 6 | 76.5% | 67.9% | +8.5% |
| Glissa Sunslayer | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Zombie Elf | 3 | 7 | 78.8% | 72.1% | +6.7% |
| Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 2 | 14 | 72.5% | 67.2% | +5.3% |
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 10 | 75.0% | 70.0% | +5.0% |
| Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 4 | 15 | 74.1% | 69.4% | +4.7% |
| Debris Beetle | Artifact — Vehicle | 4 | 6 | 70.3% | 67.9% | +2.4% |
| Choking Miasma | Sorcery | 3 | 19 | 70.0% | 67.7% | +2.3% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 33 | 69.5% | 67.4% | +2.1% |
| Cease/Desist | Instant // Sorcery | 8 | 6 | 62.5% | 60.5% | +2.0% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | 772 | 99.7% | 44.4% |
| Golgari Demons | 545 | 100.0% | 46.9% |
| Golgari Beanstalk | 28 | 96.5% | 39.9% |
| Unknown Archetype | 24 | 7.6% | 38.9% |
| Abzan Beanstalk | 24 | 70.6% | 31.3% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.